Published online November 12, 2007
doi:10.1085/jgp.200709781
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol. 130, No. 6, 611-629
The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295 $30.00
© 2007 Adebamiro et al.
A Segment of
ENaC Mediates Elastase Activation of Na+ Transport
Adedotun Adebamiro1,
Yi Cheng2,
U. Subrahmanyeswara Rao3,
Henry Danahay4, and
Robert J. Bridges2
1 Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261
2 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL 60064
3 School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech. University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX 79106
4 Novartis Horsham Research Centre, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 5AB, UK
Correspondence to Robert J. Bridges: bob.bridges{at}rosalindfranklin.edu
The epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) that mediates regulated Na+ reabsorption by epithelial cells in the kidney and lungs can be activated by endogenous proteases such as channel activating protease 1 and exogenous proteases such as trypsin and neutrophil elastase (NE). The mechanism by which exogenous proteases activate the channel is unknown. To test the hypothesis that residues on ENaC mediate protease-dependent channel activation wild-type and mutant ENaC were stably expressed in the FRT epithelial cell line using a tripromoter human ENaC construct, and protease-induced short-circuit current activation was measured in aprotinin-treated cells. The amiloride-sensitive short circuit current (INa) was stimulated by aldosterone (1.5-fold) and dexamethasone (8-fold). Dexamethasone-treated cells were used for all subsequent studies. The serum protease inhibitor aprotinin decreased baseline INa by approximately 50% and INa could be restored to baseline control values by the exogenous addition of trypsin, NE, and porcine pancreatic elastase (PE) but not by thrombin. All protease experiments were thus performed after exposure to aprotinin. Because NE recognition of substrates occurs with a preference for binding valines at the active site, several valines in the extracellular loops of
and
ENaC were sequentially substituted with glycines. This scan yielded two valine residues in
ENaC at positions 182 and 193 that resulted in inhibited responses to NE when simultaneously changed to other amino acids. The mutations resulted in decreased rates of activation and decreased activated steady-state current levels. There was an
20-fold difference in activation efficiency of NE against wild-type ENaC compared to a mutant with glycine substitutions at positions 182 and 193. However, the mutants remain susceptible to activation by trypsin and the related elastase, PE. Alanine is the preferred P1 position residue for PE and substitution of alanine 190 in the
subunit eliminated INa activation by PE. Further, substitution with a novel thrombin consensus sequence (LVPRG) beginning at residue 186 in the
subunit (
Th) allowed for INa activation by thrombin, whereas wild-type ENaC was unresponsive. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric evaluation of proteolytic digests of a 23-mer peptide encompassing the identified residues (T176-S198) showed that hydrolysis occurred between residues V193 and M194 for NE and between A190 and S191 for PE. In vitro translation studies demonstrated thrombin cleaved the
Th but not the wild-type
subunit. These results demonstrate that
subunit valines 182 and 193 are critical for channel activation by NE, alanine 190 is critical for channel activation by PE, and that channel activation can be achieved by inserting a novel thrombin consensus sequence. These results support the conclusion that protease binding and perhaps cleavage of the
subunit results in ENaC activation.
A. Adebamiro and Y. Cheng contributed equally to this work.
Abbreviations used in this paper: CAP, channel activating protease; ENaC, epithelial sodium channel; FRT, fisher rat thyroid; NE, human neutrophil elastase; PE, porcine pancreatic elastase; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid; TH, human alpha thrombin.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
The regulated transepithelial transport of Na+, critical for maintaining body fluid homeostasis in terrestrial organisms, is attributable to the expression of the heteromeric epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) (Garty and Palmer, 1997
). ENaC consists of
, ß, and
subunits (Canessa et al., 1994
; McDonald et al., 1994
). It was previously observed that exogenous aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor, inhibited Na+ transport in cortical collecting duct cells from the kidney (Margolius and Chao, 1980
; Orce et al., 1980
; Vallet et al., 1997
; Nakhoul et al., 1998
; Vuagniaux et al., 2002
) and human bronchial epithelial cells from the lung (Bridges et al., 2001
). Epithelial-derived serine proteases such as the channel activating proteases (CAPs, e.g., prostasin) activated ENaC-mediated Na+ transport when coexpressed in Xenopus oocytes (Vallet et al., 1997
; Donaldson et al., 2002
; Vuagniaux et al., 2002
). The ability of some of these proteases, CAP1 and prostasin, to increase Na+ transport in the coexpression studies was inhibited by aprotinin. In addition to the CAPs, which represent endogenous proteases, ENaC-mediated Na+ transport can also be activated by exogenous trypsin, chymotrypsin, neutrophil elastase, and cathepsin G (Chraibi et al., 1998
; Caldwell et al., 2005
; Harris et al., 2007
).
The notion that protease activation of Na+ transport results from cleavage of ENaC arises from the correlation between the appearance of cleaved forms of the
and
subunits and the measured ENaC activity. First, salt restriction or aldosterone infusion (stimuli for increasing Na+ reabsorption in the kidney) were associated with the appearance of a lower molecular weight
subunit in the rat cortical collecting duct while control rats had only the heavier
subunit (Masilamani et al., 1999
; Ergonul et al., 2006
). Two molecular weight species of the
and
subunit were found in whole rat kidneys where up-regulation of Na+ transport in collecting duct cells correlated with an increase of a lower molecular weight fragment of the
subunit and decrease of the higher molecular weight species suggesting a conversion (Ergonul et al., 2006
). Aldosterone up-regulation of prostasin in the cortical collecting duct cells (Narikiyo et al., 2002
) may generate the
subunit cleavage. Further, preventing internalization of ENaC in epithelial cells heterologously expressing ENaC increased the lower molecular weight isoforms of the
and
subunits at the apical membrane and these changes correlated with decreased sensitivity to exogenous trypsin activation (Knight et al., 2006
). Second, mutation of potential furin cleavage consensus sequences found in the
and
subunits prevented endogenous cleavage of these subunits and reduced Na+ transport rates (Hughey et al., 2004a
; Bruns et al., 2007
).
The single channel studies by Caldwell et al. (2004
, 2005
) provided evidence that exogenously added serine proteases could activate the channel by direct proteolysis. These results suggest that proteases can directly bind to the channel and induce activation by cleavage. Based on the observations that trypsin and human neutrophil elastase could maximally activate silent channels, we tested the hypothesis that proteases directly interact with ENaC, causing activation of Na+ transport in a model epithelial cell line. Site-directed mutagenesis and analysis of the kinetics of current activation by the related proteases neutrophil elastase and porcine pancreatic elastases as well as thrombin were used to show that specific protease interactions with ENaC occur in a segment of the
subunit.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
DNA Constructs
Construction of Human
, ß,
ENaC Tripromoter Expression Vector.
Standard molecular biology methods were used to construct the ENaC tripromoter expression vector. The human
, ß, and
ENaC subunit cDNAs were isolated from human lung epithelial cells. All three cDNA sequences were identical to the sequence reported by McDonald et al. (1994)
(GenBank/EMBL/DDBJaccession nos. L29007, L36592, and L36593). The
cDNA was subcloned into pECFPN1 and a stop codon introduced at the 3' end of the
subunit to prevent the expression of the CFP. The ß and
subunits were subcloned into the pEGFPN1 vector (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) to obtain pEGFPN1/ß and pEGFPN1/
. Appropriate start and stop codons were inserted to allow for the expression of the ß and
subunits without the C-terminal expression of EGFP. The DNA fragments from pEGFPN1/ß and pEGFP/
vectors comprising the CMV promoters and the subunit cDNA without the GFP sequences were isolated and then subcloned into pECFPN1/
to generate a 13.4-kb tripromoter
ß
hENaC vector (hENaC). The important features of the hENaC vector are that all three ENaC subunits are arranged in tandem and expression of each subunit is under an independent CMV promoter allowing for the separate expression of each subunit without the expression of ECFP or EGFP. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using Quick Change II XL (Stratagene) for single and double amino acid substitutions. Overlap PCR was performed using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes) to introduce a human thrombin consensus sequence (LVPRG) by multiple contiguous substitutions in the
186-190 sequence of hENaC. Overlapping fragments were synthesized by PCR with forward and reverse primers 5'-CTCGTGCCAAGAGGCTCAATGTCATGCACATCGAGTCC-3' and 5'-GCTCCTCAGCAGAATAGCTCATGTTGATTTTCTTCTCC-3'. A second set of forward and reverse primers, 5'-CTGCAGGCCACCAACATCTTTGCACAGGTGCCACAGC-3' and 5'-GCCTCTTGGCACCAACATCTTTGCACAGGTGCCACAGC-3', containing Sbf I and BbvC I restriction sites were used in a second round of PCR to yield the blunt end product that was subcloned into the pCR 4Blunt-TOPO vector (Invitrogen), digested with Sbf I/BbvC I, and ligated to the appropriate Sbf I/BbvC I digest fragment of hENaC. V5 C terminal epitope–tagged
ENaC was generated in pc DNA 3.1 hygromycin (Invitrogen) using a standard two-step overlapping PCR method. The sequences of all mutations were verified by DNA sequencing.
RNA Isolation and RT-PCR Experiments
Total RNA was prepared from parental or hENaC FRT cells, using the ThermoScript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was then subjected to PCR amplification using Finnzymes' Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Inc.). Primers were designed for identical sequences in human and rat
ENaC. Primer sequences were as follows: forward 5'-GGA GAG AAG ATC AAA GCC AAA ATC-3', reverse 5'-GCA TCT CAA TAC TGT TGG CTG GGC-3'. PCR products were separated on a 0.9% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Amplified products were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Cell Culture and Transfection
Fisher rat thyroid (FRT) cells were grown in sodium bicarbonate–buffered Hams's F-12 media (Sigma-Aldrich) modified with 10% FCS (Hyclone), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 U/ml streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2 as previously described (Sheppard et al., 1994
). The cells were expanded in plastic tissue culture flasks. Confluent monolayers were stably transfected with hENaC or mutant plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and Opti-MEM media (Invitrogen) as described by the manufacturer's instructions and selected with G418 (500 µg/ml; Invitrogen). The selected cells were fed with media containing 50 µM amiloride. FRT cells were seeded onto permeable tissue culture inserts (Transwell Clear, 0.4 µM pore size, 6 mm diameter; Corning) and fed three times a week with or without supplementation with dexamethasone (30 nM) or aldosterone (30 nM). The cells matured for at least 10 d and amiloride was removed from the feeding media two feeding cycles before short-circuit current measurements.
Short-Circuit Current (ISC) Measurements
Current measurements were performed 10–14 d after seeding. The epithelial cell monolayers were studied by placing the Transwell tissue culture inserts into Costar Ussing chambers with apical and basolateral bathing solution containing (in mM) 120 NaCl, 25 NaHCO3, 3.3 KH2PO4, 0.8 K2HPO4, 1.2 MgCl2, 1.2 CaCl2, and 10 glucose as previously described (Bridges et al., 2001
). The apical and basolateral solutions were continuously circulated with a gas lift. The pH of the solution was 7.4 at 37°C when gassed with a mixture of 95% O2:5% CO2. The monolayers were continuously short circuited with a voltage clamp (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA), and transepithelial resistance was monitored by periodically applying a 4-mV bipolar pulse and calculating resistance from the current change. The amiloride-sensitive ISC (INa) obtained from the difference in current with and without amiloride (50 µM) in the apical bath was taken as a measure of ENaC-mediated electrogenic Na+ transport. The amiloride-insensitive current was minimal (<5% of the baseline ISC). Untransfected FRT cells did not show an INa. The proteases trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich), human neutrophil elastase (NE; EPC), porcine pancreatic elastase (PE; EPC), and human
thrombin (TH; Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the apical bath and mixed by rapid pipetting with a transfer pipette.
Protocol for INa Activation by Proteases
To observe significant and reproducible protease activation it was necessary to pretreat the cells with the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin. Several epithelia appear to have constitutive activation of Na+ transport that can be inhibited by aprotinin in a time-dependent manner and the transport rate rapidly reverts to control levels upon addition of exogenous trypsin (Vallet et al., 1997
; Bridges et al., 2001
; Adebamiro et al., 2005
; Myerburg et al., 2006
). The slow time dependence of aprotinin inhibition and rapid reversal by excess protease suggests that in the presence of aprotinin, active channels are continually retrieved or degraded while new inactive channels are inserted. This pool of newly inserted channels can then be activated by exogenous proteases. The time course of aprotinin inhibition of current in mammalian airway cells has a half life of
45 min (Bridges et al., 2001
). To ensure maximal inhibition for all constructs examined in experiments involving pre-protease inhibition, the protease inhibitor, aprotinin (10 µM; Sigma-Aldrich) or a vehicle control (PBS) was added to the apical surface of the monolayers overnight as previously reported (Vallet et al., 1997
) in the modified Ham's F-12 media 1 and remained in the apical bath solution during ISC measurements. Overnight treatment reduced the variability in the inhibition of INa by aprotinin and improved the quantitative analysis of the results.
Data Evaluation and Analysis
The effects of the proteases were assessed in two ways. First, steady-state INa was assessed before protease addition (baseline INa), then after the INa reached a steady-state 20–30 min after addition of NE, PE, or TH (IPR). Trypsin was then added in excess over the aprotinin concentration to obtain ITryp. To compare the effects of NE, PE, and TH to that of trypsin we used the ratio IPR/ITryp and the normalized value
IPRNorm where
IPRNorm = (IPR – baseline INa)/(ITryp – baseline INa). IPR was measured 20–30 min after the addition of protease (NE, PE, or TH) and ITryp was measured 5 min after the addition of trypsin. Second, following addition of NE, PE, or TH the time course of the
IPRNorm in each experiment was analyzed according to two reactions. The first reaction is shown in Eq. 1.
 | (1) |
The quantity C is the inactive channel at the membrane, E is the added enzyme concentration, and A is the channel activated by proteases. The rate coefficients kon and koff have their usual meanings. The differential equation from Eq. 1 is
 | (2) |
Under the assumption that the enzyme concentration is constant due to being in excess and there is no autolysis, the differential equation is solved to yield exponential functions in time that can be fitted to the whole time course of current activation (see online supplemental material, available at http://www.jgp.org/cgi/content/full/jgp.200709781/DC1). The time courses for individual experiments were fitted using Matlab (The Mathworks) to Eq. 3.
 | (3) |
A linear term was added to Eq. 3 to account for a slow decreasing trend in the current records. The reciprocal of the time constant
was taken as a measure of the apparent relaxation rate constant kobs. It is shown in the supplemental material that the kobs is given by
 | (4) |
The second reaction is of the form shown in Eq. 5.
 | (5) |
The differential equations from Eq. 5 are
 | (6) |
 | (7) |
The koff and kon have their usual meanings and kcat is simply used to express a rate-limiting enzyme concentration-independent step. It is shown in the online supplemental material that the time course of activation can also be approximated by Eq. 3 but here the kobs is given by Eq. 8:
 | (8) |
where
Linear and nonlinear regression analysis of the kobs versus enzyme concentration was performed in OriginPro (OriginLab).
Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Analysis (MALDI-TOF)
The sites of cleavage by NE, PE, and TH were searched by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry on a 23-mer peptide designated peptide T176-S198 (Ac-TGRKRKVGGSIHKASNVMHIES-NH2) and corresponding to the amino acid sequence T176 to S198 of the
subunit of ENaC. Additional peptides with glycine substitutions at V182, V193, and A190 as well as a peptide substituted with a TH consensus sequence (LVPRG) beginning at residue 186 were evaluated. Enzymatic digestions were performed at 37°C with NE, PE, and TH at final enzyme concentrations of 200 nM and peptide T176-S198 at 200 µM in 200 mM Tris acetate, pH 7.4. Following the incubation period, 100 µl of the reaction was quenched by lowering the pH to 3 with addition of 1.0% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The reaction without and with the enzymes were subjected to MALDI-TOF measurements. A ZipTip C18 solid-phase extraction sorbant (Millipore) was washed with 10 µl of acetonitrile/water (1:1, vol/vol) and then equilibrated with aqueous 0.1% TFA. Peptide samples acidified with 5% aqueous TFA to enhance peptide retention on the stationary phase of the C18 sorbant were loaded onto the tip and eluted with 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile/water (1:1, vol/vol). The matrix solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 1 ml of acetonitrile/water (1:1, vol/vol) containing 0.1% TFA. 0.5 µl of the matrix solution was mixed with 0.5 µl of peptide solution. About 0.5 µl of the mixture was deposited onto the MALDI stage and air dried. Positive ion MALDI-TOF Mass spectra were acquired on an Applied Biosystems Voayger DE-Star mass spectrometer operated in reflector mode. Following time-delayed extraction, the ions were accelerated to 20 kV for TOF analysis. A total of 100 laser shots were acquired and signal averaged per spectrum.
In Vitro Translation and Western Blots
cDNAs were transcribed and translated in vitro in the presence of canine pancreatic microsomal membranes using the TnT-coupled reticulocyte lysate systems (Promega). Total DNA templates (0.5 µg) containing 0.25µg
ß and 0.25µg
-V5 or 0.25 µg of
Th-V5 ENaC subunits were added to an aliquot of the TnT T7 Quick Master mix containing 2 µl microsomal membranes and incubated at 30°C for 60 min. The translation products were collected by centrifuging for 15 min at
10,000 g. and subjected to lysis in 1% Triton X-100 buffer (1% Triton X-100, 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) at 4°C . The lysates were incubated for 5 min at 37°C in the presence or absence of 200 nM human
thrombin (Sigma-Aldrich). All samples in 1x SDS-PAGE sample buffer containing 100 mM DTT were heated for 10 min at 70°C before loading. Proteins were separated on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen) and were transferred to Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore). Proteins were detected by Western blot with mouse monoclonal anti-V5 antibody (Invitrogen) targeting a V5 epitope on the C terminus of the
ENaC subunit. The signal was developed with the Supersignal west femto maximum sensitivity substrate (Pierce Chemical Co.) and detected with X-Omat Blue XB-1 imaging film (Kodak).
Statistics
Effects of the proteases on steady-state INa for the wild-type hENaC were determined using paired t tests of (1) INa at baseline versus IPR or ITryp and (2) IPR versus ITryp. Comparison of the ratio of
IPRNorm and
across multiple mutants was performed with one-way ANOVA followed by individual comparisons versus wild-type ENaC using the Bonferroni corrected t test in Origin . P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Online Supplemental Material
The online supplemental material (available at http://www.jgp.org/cgi/content/full/jgp.200709781/DC1) provides the derivations of Eqs. 3 and 8 where the solutions to differential Eqs. 2, 6, and 7 are given.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Expression of ENaC-mediated Na+ Transport in FRT Cells and Regulation by Corticosteroids and Protease
FRT epithelial cells stably transfected with the
, ß, and
human ENaC subunits in a single tripromoter vector (hENaC) had an ISC that was blocked by addition of amiloride (50 µM) to the apical side (Fig. 1, A and B).
The magnitude of the amiloride-sensitive ISC (INa) averaged 3.4 ± 0.12 µA/cm2 (n = 11) and is similar to what has been typically observed by transiently transfecting FRT cells simultaneously with the three ENaC subunits in separate plasmids (Snyder, 2000
). Feeding the cells in media supplemented with either aldosterone (30 nM) or dexamethasone (30 nM) for 72 h or more before short circuiting significantly increased INa with no increase in the amiloride-insensitive ISC. Aldosterone induced a 1.5-fold (n = 7) increase in INa while dexamethasone induced an eightfold (n = 11) increase in INa (Fig. 1 B). The half maximal inhibitory concentration (Ki) for amiloride was 570 ± 86 nM with a maximal inhibition of 96 ± 1.2%. To determine whether proteases regulate Na+ transport in FRT cells stably expressing hENaC, the effect of exogenously added trypsin and protease inhibitor were examined. The cells were first preincubated either with the protease inhibitor aprotinin (10 µM) or a vehicle control (PBS) on the apical side for 16–24 h. The cells that were preincubated with aprotinin had decreased INa compared with cells preincubated with PBS. During short circuiting, addition of trypsin (15 µM) to the apical bath, in a 5 µM excess over the aprotinin concentration, caused no statistically significant increase in the INa of PBS-preincubated cells (3.9 ± 0.87 to 4.5 ± 1.03 µA/cm2; n = 11) but significantly increased INa in aprotinin-pretreated cells. The baseline INa in the aprotinin-pretreated cells was 3.1 ± 0.68 and the maximal INa after addition of trypsin (ITryp) was 5.9 ± 0.68 µA/cm2 (n = 12). No differences were found in the trypsin-activated current between PBS- and aprotinin-treated cells. Consequently, aprotinin unmasks a portion of INa that can be regulated by extracellular protease activity similar to the previously reported effects of aprotinin and trypsin. The absolute values of the aprotinin and trypsin effects on INa were greatly enhanced in dexamethasone-treated cells but displayed the same qualitative pattern (Fig. 2, A and B).
As already noted, dexamethasone treatment greatly increased the INa (37.0 ± 1.19 µA/cm2, n = 18). Trypsin addition had no effect on INa (37.1 ± 1.14 µA/cm2, n = 18) in PBS-pretreated dexamethasone-stimulated cells. Pretreatment with aprotinin caused a 50% decrease in the baseline INa (21.3 ± 0.85 µA/cm2, n = 18) and in aprotinin-inhibited cells trypsin doubled the INa (40.8 ± 2.09 µA/cm2, n = 18) to the value observed in PBS-pretreated cells (Fig. 2, A and B). An excess of trypsin above the aprotinin concentration was required to stimulate INa. In addition, the stimulatory effects of trypsin on INa in aprotinin-treated cells was blocked by soy bean trypsin inhibitor (
INa with SBTI 0.7 ± 1.22 µA/cm2, n = 6). Because the dexamethasone-stimulated hENaC-expressing FRT cells gave a more robust and reproducible INa and the protease regulatory pattern persists in dexamethasone-treated cells, dexamethasone-treated cells were used in the remainder of the study. Dexamethasone treatment of untransfected FRT cells did not produce amiloride- or trypsin- sensitive ISC. In untransfected parental cells treated with PBS, the ISC before trypsin, after trypsin, and after amiloride addition were 0.1 ± 0.06, 0.2 ± 0.06, and 0.2 ± 0.07 µA/cm2 (n = 12), respectively. For cells treated with aprotinin, the ISC were 0.7 ± 0.3, 0.5 ± 0.16, and 0.5 ± 0.16 µA/cm2 (n = 12) before trypsin, after trypsin, and after amiloride, respectively. Furthermore, in cells treated with 30 nM dexamethasone that were stably transfected with the
and ß hENaC subunits but without the
hENaC subunit there was no INa before trypsin (0.2 ± 0.12) µA/cm2, after trypsin (0.3 ± 0.08 µA/cm2), and amiloride (0.4 ± 0.09 µA/cm2, n = 6). RT-PCR analysis of RNA derived from parental FRT cells without or with dexamethasone treatment did not detect any PCR product for rat
ENaC but the expected
hENaC product was detected with RNA derived from the hENaC-transfected FRT cells (Fig. 3).
Thus dexamethasone-stimulated expression of endogenous rat
ENaC and complementation with
and ß hENaC subunits cannot explain the INa observed in our studies. The importance of this assertion will become apparent in subsequent results.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 2. Na+ transport regulation by aprotinin and trypsin in FRT epithelial cells. (A) Representative ISC traces in FRT cells expressing ENaC, preincubated with and kept in vehicle (PBS) control or aprotinin (APR; 10 µM) during short-circuiting as indicated by the bars. Also shown are traces from cells prestimulated with dexamethasone (30 nM). Trypsin (15 µM) and amiloride (50 µM) were added to the apical side as indicated (horizontal bars). (B) INa (mean ± SEM, n = 11–18) before (open bars) and after (solid bars) addition of trypsin in PBS-preincubated cells and aprotinin-preincubated cells without or with dexamethasone stimulation as indicated. *, P < 0.05 by paired Student's t test comparison of INa at baseline and after addition of trypsin (ITryp).
| |
In addition to modulating sodium transport, aprotinin and trypsin also altered the transepithelial resistance (RT). Aprotinin treatment caused a 50% decrease in RT compared with PBS-treated hENaC-FRT cells (aprotinin 502 ± 47
cm2 vs. PBS 769 ± 45
cm2, n = 6) and this effect was reversed by trypsin (aprotinin plus trypsin 1555 ± 125
cm2 vs. PBS plus trypsin 1215 ± 101
cm2, n = 6). Amiloride further increased RT in both aprotinin- and PBS trypsin–treated cells to 2614 ± 164
cm2 and 3592 ± 289
cm2 (n = 6), respectively. Amiloride, when added before trypsin, did not prevent the increase in RT caused by trypsin in the aprotinin-treated cells (
RT aprotinin plus trypsin 1053
cm2 vs.
RT aprotinin plus amiloride plus trypsin 1113
cm2, n = 3). The effects of aprotinin and trypsin on RT were also observed in parental untransfected FRT cells (unpublished data) and these effects have been reported by others in different epithelia (Lynch et al., 1995
; Liu et al., 2002
). It has been suggested these effects are due to changes in the resistance of the tight junction (Meyer et al., 1988
; Kemmner and Zaar, 1991
). Serosal to mucosal fluxes of the extracellular maker mannitol revealed aprotinin treatment increased the flux by 60% when compared with PBS-treated hENaC FRT cells (aprotinin 1.3 ± 0.04 nMol/h/cm2 vs. PBS 0.8 ± 0.05 nMol/h/cm2, n = 6) and this effect was reversed by trypsin (aprotinin plus trypsin 0.4 ± 0.07 nMol/h/cm2 vs. PBS plus trypsin 0.5 ± 0.05 nMol/h/cm2, n = 6). Because we studied sodium transport under short-circuited conditions and in symmetric solutions these changes in the paracellular pathway resistance are not expected to influence our measurements of INa. Furthermore as shown below NE, PE, and thrombin do not alter RT but do increase INa in aprotinin-treated hENaC-FRT cells.
Submicromolar Neutrophil and Porcine Elastase Activate ENaC in FRT Cells
It was previously shown that, like trypsin, NE can activate ENaC-mediated Na+ current (Caldwell et al., 2005
; Harris et al., 2007
). We examined the effect of NE and PE, a similar elastase (Baugh and Travis, 1976
; Travis et al., 1979
), on the ISC in FRT cells expressing hENaC. Elastase is not inhibited by aprotinin (Baugh and Travis, 1976
; Ohlsson and Olsson, 1976
), therefore an excess over the aprotinin concentration was not required to stimulate INa. Addition of NE (300 nM) or PE (300 nM) to the apical side of FRT cells expressing hENaC did not alter the INa in cells pretreated with PBS (Fig. 4 and Table I).
Subsequent addition of trypsin did not further increase the INa in PBS pretreated cells. Similar to the effects of trypsin NE and PE clearly increased the INa in cells that were pretreated with 10 µM aprotinin as shown in Fig. 4 (B and D). The rise in the INa following elastase addition occurred over a 5-min period and increased to a plateau value equal to the baseline INa of uninhibited cells that were preincubated with PBS. Addition of trypsin subsequent to NE or PE produced small further increases in the INa in aprotinin-treated cells (P < 0.01). The irreversible NE inhibitor MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Ala-CMK at 4 µM nearly completely prevented the stimulation of INa by NE (300 nM) (
INa without inhibitor 24.1 ± 4.21 µA/cm2, n = 6;
INa with inhibitor 2.7 ± 0.60 µA/cm2, n = 6) and confirm the results of Harris et al. (2007)
using a novel NE inhibitor in Xenopus oocyte studies. Thus, NE or PE increased INa in aprotinin-inhibited cells to the values observed in control PBS-treated cells and only a small additional further stimulation was seen with trypsin addition in the case of NE-stimulated cells (Fig. 4, E and F, and Table I).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 4. Elastase-mediated activation of ENaC in FRT cells. (A–D) Representative ISC in FRT cells expressing ENaC that were either pretreated with PBS (A and C) or with 10 µM aprotinin (B and D). (A and B) NE (300 nM) or (C and D) PE (300 nM) was added to the apical bath of short-circuited cells. Trypsin (15 µM) and amiloride (50 µM) were subsequently added to the apical baths in all experiments as indicated (horizontal bars). (E) INa (mean ± SEM, n = 16–24) before (open bars), after 300 nM of NE or (F) PE (stripped bars), and after 15 µM trypsin (shaded bars). *, P < 0.05 in paired Student's t tests of baseline INa and after NE or PE addition. , P < 0.05 in paired student's t tests of INa after NE/PE and after trypsin.
| |
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE I Protease Effect on Amiloride Sensitive Short-Circuit Current (INa) in Cells Expressing Wild Type or Selected Glycine Scan Substitutions
| |
Identification of Elastase-specific Sites I: Human Neutrophil Elastase
To determine whether specific sites on ENaC mediate the NE-dependent activation of INa, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of possible NE binding or hydrolytic sites in the extracellular loops of
and
ENaC subunits. NE hydrolyzes polypeptides with a strong preference for cleavage of V-X bonds where V is at the P1 position and X is an amino acid at the P1' position. The preference is a function of both the binding affinity of the elastase for the cleavage site (KM) and the rate of hydrolysis (kcat). Hydrolysis by NE can also occur with other small hydrophobic amino acids at the P1 position but to a lesser degree (Zimmerman and Ashe, 1977
). We tested the effect of mutating individual valines conservatively to glycines in the extracellular loops of
and
ENaC because these subunits appear to be involved in activation and or processing by endogenous proteases (Masilamani et al., 1999
; Hughey et al., 2004a
; Ergonul et al., 2006
; Knight et al., 2006
). The valine mutation sites were chosen based on their proximity to previously implicated cleavage sites (Hughey et al., 2004a
). A total of eight V to G mutants were evaluated, three in the
subunit and five in the
subunits. Stable cell lines expressing these mutants were selected and the effects of aprotinin, NE, and trypsin on INa were measured. These results are summarized in Table I. All eight V to G mutants expressed baseline currents that were similar to wild-type hENaC-expressing cells. Furthermore aprotinin inhibited the baseline current to a similar degree and NE reversed this inhibition of INa (Table I). Only the double mutant
ß
V182G;V193G was different from wild-type ENaC (WT). Unlike wild-type ENaC and several mutants where subsequent addition of trypsin had a minor further effect on INa following NE stimulation in aprotinin-treated cells (Table I, Fig. 4 B, and Fig. 5, A–D),
ß
V182G;V193G could be substantially further stimulated by trypsin (Table I and Fig. 4, E and F).
As shown in the figures, addition of NE to aprotinin-treated FRT cells expressing wild-type ENaC increased INa from 15.6 ± 0.86 µA/cm2 to 27.8 ± 1.40 µA/cm2 (n = 36) within 10 min. Thereafter, addition of trypsin caused only a small further increase to 31.3 ± 1.60 µA/cm2. Thus NE caused an increase that was
85% of the trypsin- induced maximal protease increase in wild-type ENaC-expressing cells. In contrast addition of NE to aprotinin-treated FRT cells expressing the
ß
V182G;V193G mutant increased INa from 18.3 ± 0.67 to 25.9 ± 1.07 µA/cm2 (n = 39), but the ISC could be further stimulated to 39.9 ± 1.12 µA/cm2 after the addition of trypsin. Thus in the
ß
V182G;V193G cells, NE only stimulated
36% of the INa stimulated by trypsin.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 5. Two point mutations in ENaC inhibit NE activation of INa in FRT cells. (A) Representative ISC of cells expressing V182G, (C) V193G, and (E) V182G;193G that were pretreated with 10 µM aprotinin before short circuiting. NE (300 nM) was added to the apical bath as indicated (horizontal bars). Subsequently, trypsin (15 µM) and amiloride (50 µM) were added. (B, D, and F) Mean (±SEM, n = 13–39) of baseline INa (open bars), IPR (stripped bars), and ITryp (shaded bars) in cells pretreated with PBS or aprotinin that were expressing ß V182G (B), ß V193G (D), and ß V182G;193G (F) mutants. *, P < 0.05 in Student's t test comparison of amiloride-sensitive ISC before and after NE. , P < 0.05;  , P < 0.01 in Student's t test comparison of amiloride sensitive ISC after NE and after trypsin.
| |
A closer examination of the current traces revealed that the rate of activation by NE was also affected by the valine to glycine mutations and this effect was investigated in greater detail. The changes in INa following addition of NE (300 nM) to wild-type and mutant ENaCs were monitored with time and reported (Fig. 6 A) as a fraction of the maximal trypsin-stimulated INa.
The fractional current increase normalized to the maximum response after trypsin (
IPRNorm) was fitted to exponentials as described in Materials and methods to yield time constants. The
IPRNorm
30 min after NE addition was taken as the measure of maximal NE-stimulated current. The fitted parameters are summarized in Table II for
ß
and the glycine scanning mutations showing that only specific mutations in the
subunit appreciably change the time course.
Representative time courses for wild type,
ß
V182G,
ß
V193G, and
ß
V182G;V193G are shown in Fig. 5 A. In wild-type and
ß
V182G-expressing cells the
IPRNorm rose with identical rates and to similar plateau values with amplitudes 0.68 ± 0.05 and 0.64 ± 0.04, respectively. Therefore, mutating V182 to G had no effect on NE activation of current. The cells expressing
ß
V193G had
IPRNorm of 0.53 ± 0.05, which was not significantly decreased from wild type; but they showed a significant elongation of the time constant from the wild-type value of 3.1 ± 0.18 min (n = 10) to 6.3 ± 0.36 min (n = 5). As noted above, cells expressing the double mutant,
ß
V182G;V193G, had a marked reduction of
IPRNorm (0.22 ± 0.02) as well as a further elongation of the time constant to 11.8 ± 1.49 min (n = 8). Therefore, while mutating the V182 to G182 had no discernible effect on its own, this mutation produced a pronounced effect in the presence of the already inhibitory V193G mutation. To differentiate an effect caused by changing a V from an effect introduced specifically by the G, several amino acids were substituted at positions 182 and 193. The effect of mutating
V182 and V193 was not specific to glycine but consistent for several amino acid substitutions (S, T, D, E, and Q). Generally, substitutions at
182 did not result in significant differences in the
for the residues tested (Fig. 6). At residue 193, all the substitutions except E caused a significant prolongation of
compared with wild type (Fig. 6 B). Substitutions at both
182 and
193 produced significant elongation of
for all the substitutions compared with wild type (Fig. 6 B). The changes in
IPRNorm caused by the mutations were roughly consistent with the changes in
. Generally,
IPRNorm was not affected by substitutions at
182 only, except with the S substitution (Fig. 6 C). The
IPRNorm was reduced for substitutions at
193, except for the G substitution (Fig. 6 C). All double substitutions at 182 and 193 resulted in decreased
IPRNorm compared with wild type. These results are more consistent with the conclusion that removal of a valine (as opposed to introduction of a specific residue) was responsible for both prolongation of
and decreased
IPRNorm. Secondarily, the conserved pattern where substitutions at 182 produce no effect; substitutions at 193 increased
and decreased
IPRNorm; and double substitutions further increasing
and decreasing
IPRNorm suggest that the V193 is of primary importance in current activation by NE but V182 also has some effect unmasked in the absence of V193.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 6. Effect of mutating residues 182 and 193 in the extracellular domain of ENaC on NE activation of INa. NE (300 nM) was added to short-circuited FRT cells expressing the indicated ENaC mutants that were pretreated with 10 µM aprotinin. 30 min after addition of NE, trypsin (15 µM) was added in excess over aprotinin to achieve a reference point for maximal protease stimulation. (A) Representative traces of IPRNorm for NE activation of wild type (solid squares), ß V182G (open squares), ß V193G (solid circles), and ß V182G; 193G (open circles) ENaCs. The solid lines are the exponential fits of the data. (B) Steady-state values of IPRNorm for the amino acid substitution at 182 and 193 in ENaC (mean ± SEM, n = 6–36). *, P < 0.05, one way ANOVA and t test comparison with wild type. (C) Summary of the from experiments described above (mean ± SEM, n = 4–10) for several amino acid substitutions at residues 182 and 193 in ENaC. *, P < 0.01, one way ANOVA.
| |
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE II Fitted Parameters for Neutrophil Elastase Activation of ENaC-mediated Na+ Current in WT and Mutant ENaC Heterologously Expressed in FRT Cells
| |
Identification of Elastase-specific Sites II: Porcine Pancreatic Elastase
First, we tested if the valines critical for NE were also critical for PE activation of current. ISC following addition of PE (300 nM) was monitored to determine the effect of simultaneous substitutions at residues 182 and 193 on PE-mediated channel activation. The effects of the double substitutions on
IPRNorm were small compared with the results for NE. As shown in Fig. 7 (A and B), the time courses for wild type and G substitutions were slightly prolonged.
The
was prolonged from 2.0 ± 0.14 min (n = 11) for wild type to 3.6 ± 0.27 min (n = 11) for the G substitutions. The effect on
IPRNorm was not different between wild type and G substitutions at
0.7 for both (n = 16 and 23, respectively; Fig. 7 C). The rest of the double substitutions examined (S, Q, E, and T) had small effects on
and
IPRNorm (Fig. 7, D and E). These results show that the valines 182 and 193 were not critical for increasing INa by PE.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 7. Effect of mutations at 182, 190, and 193 in the extracellular domain of ENaC on PE activation of INa.. PE (300 nM) was added to short-circuited FRT cells expressing the indicated ENaC mutants that were pretreated with 10 µM aprotinin. 20 min after addition of PE, trypsin (15 µM) was added in excess over aprotinin to achieve a reference point for maximal protease stimulation. (A and B) Representative ISC trace of FRT cells expressing wild type or ß V182G;V193G mutant. (C) Representative IPRNorm response to PE for wild type (solid squares) and ß V182G;V193G (open squares) mutant with exponential fits (solid lines). (D) Summary of the (±SEM, n = 4–11) from experiments described above for double substitutions at residues 182 and 193 in ENaC. (E) The steady-state IPRNorm (±SEM, n = 8–23) ratios for the double substitutions at 182 and 193 in ENaC. (F and G) Representative ISC trace for FRT cells expressing wild type, ß V182G;V193G, and ß A190G ENaC, respectively. 1,000 nM PE was used. (H and I) (±SEM, n = 5–8) and steady-state IPRNorm (±SEM, n = 5–8) for responses to 1,000 nM PE in cells expressing wild type (open bars), ß V182G;193G (light gray bars), and ß A190G (dark gray bars). *, P < 0.05, one way ANOVA and t test comparison with wild type.
| |
Unlike NE, the preferential residue at P1 is A for PE (Hartley and Shotton, 1971
). Therefore one explanation for minor effects of the V substitutions is that PE interacts with the channel via its preferred residue somewhere else. We reasoned that
A190 between the two valines critical for NE was a likely target. Substitution of the
A190 to G resulted in significant attenuation of the current response to PE (Fig. 7, F–H). While 1,000 nM PE activated current in wild type and the
ß
V182G;V193G double mutant ENaC (Fig. 7, F and G), with
of 1.94 ± 0.12 and 2.17 ± 0.07 min, respectively, the mutant
ß
A190G prevented PE activation of current. Because increases in INa were small to nonexistent in the
ß
A190G mutant in response to PE,
could not be resolved for all experiments. For those experiments where
was resolved, it averaged 25.6 ± 1.09 min (Fig. 7 H). Furthermore, the
IPRNorm, which was 0.70 ± 0.04 and 0.89 ± 0.03 for wild type and
ß
V182G;V193G, respectively, was reduced to 0.26 ± 0.02 for
ß
A190G (Fig. 7 I). These results are consistent with
A190 being of primary significance for PE current stimulation, whereas the Vs are more important for NE current stimulation. Because the results are consistent with the P1 preferences for PE and NE, they suggest that these enzymes interact with the channel according to their substrate recognition specificities.
Concentration Dependence of Protease Activation
Because the previous results suggest direct protease–ENaC interaction, a concentration dependence of activation was used to delineate two mechanistic possibilities of current activation: (1) that direct binding was sufficient for channel activation or (2) that binding plus a secondary step is necessary. As can be seen from the progress curves of
IPRNorm (Fig. 8 A) the rates of current activation as well as the amplitudes of the increase were concentration dependent.
Increasing NE concentration from 30 to 1,000 nM reduced
for cells expressing wild type from 11.3 ± 1.5 min (n = 8) to 1.6 ± 0.04 min (n = 8). The
IPRNorm increased with increasing concentration of NE from 0.22 ± 0.02 at 30 nM to 0.75 ± 0.05 at 1,000 nM (Fig. 8 D). The
and
IPRNorm for cells expressing the
ß
V182G; V193G mutant were also concentration dependent (Fig. 8, B and D). Time constants decreased from 13.8 ± 3.2 min (n = 8) at 30 nM NE to 5.9 ± 0.3 min (n = 8) at 1,000 nM NE, and
IPRNorm increased from –0.02 ± 0.04 to 0.52 ± 0.02. The concentration dependence of current activation suggests a first approximation of the mechanism of activation of current by NE and PE. Because only one exponential component was present in the fitting of the time courses, the reciprocal of the derived time constants were taken as a pseudo-first-order rate coefficient, kobs. For wild-type ENaC, the pseudo-first-order rate constant (kobs) showed saturation behavior with respect to the added enzyme concentration (Fig. 8 C). From the saturation at relatively slow rates, assuming that the enzyme concentration in the chamber was not altered by concentration-dependent autolysis and that the enzyme concentration is in a large excess over its target ENaC, apparent kinetic parameters were derived based on Eq. 8 by nonlinear regression of kobs against the added enzyme concentration.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 8. NE concentration dependence of the activation of INa in FRT cells expressing wild type and ß V182G;V193G mutant ENaC. (A) Representative IPRNorm responses in FRT cells expressing wild-type ENaC to 30 nM NE (solid squares), 100 nM NE (open squares), 300 nM NE (solid circles), 600 nM NE (open circles), and 1,000 nM NE (solid triangles). (B) Representative IPRNorm responses in FRT cells expressing ß V182G;V193G to 30 nM NE (solid squares), 100 nM NE (open squares), 300 nM NE (solid circles), 600 nM NE (open circles), and 1,000 nM NE (solid triangles). (C) Mean (±SEM, n = 7–8) of kobs (=1/ ) with respect to the NE concentration for FRT cells expressing wild type (solid squares) and ß V182G;V193G (open squares) ENaC. The solid line through the solid squares is the predicted values from a fit of the wild-type dataset to a kinetic model (see Results) were kcat = 14.2 10–3 s–1 and KM = 570 nM. The solid line through the open squares is a linear regression of the ß V182G;V193G dataset with slope 1,300 M–1s–1 (P < 0.05). (D) Steady-state IPRNorm (±SEM, n = 7–8) ratios for wild type (solid squares) and ß V182G;193G mutant (open squares). Solid lines are fits of the datasets to saturation kinetics. K1/2 was 89 and 470 nM, respectively.
| |
In cells expressing wild-type ENaC the KM was 570 ± 240 nM NE and the kcat was 14.4 ± 2.11 x 10–3 s–1. When the
ß
V182G;V193G was expressed, the kobs also showed a dependence on enzyme concentration (Fig. 8, B–D). However, the dependence of kobs on enzyme concentration, in contrast to wild-type ENaC, did not show an apparent saturation; consequently the parameters kcat and KM could not be calculated. One reason why this arises may be because the concentration of NE used was well below the KM. A linear regression was performed under the assumption that [E] << KM. The slope of the regression, kcat/KM, was 1,300 ± 200 x M–1s–1. This quotient represents the efficiency of NE activation of the
V182G;V193G double mutant. This quotient for wild-type ENaC was calculated from the fitted parameters and was
25,000 M–1s–1. Thus NE efficiency for activating wild-type ENaC is
20 times that for activating the
ß
V182G;V193G mutant. The
IPRNorm current plateau values at each NE concentration were also fitted to a saturation curve of the form
where (
IPRNorm)max is the maximum increase and K1/2 is the enzyme concentration at half maximal stimulation. For NE on wild-type ENaC the K1/2 was 100 ± 18 nM, and (
IPR/ITryp)Max was 0.84 ± 0.04. For NE on the
ß
V182G;V193G mutant, K1/2 was 510 ± 162 nM and (
IPRNorm)Max was 0.94 ± 0.14. Consequently, the apparent affinity for NE activation of INa is
5-fold weaker for the
ß
V182G;193G mutant compared with wild-type ENaC.
A concentration dependence of activation was also observed for PE activation of the INa. The same analysis as described above was performed for the PE datasets. For wild-type ENaC, the saturation behavior of the activation rate (Fig. 9 A) had a KM of 204± 140 nM and kcat was 11.4 ± 1.34 x 10–3 s–1. For the mutant
ß
V182G;V193G, the dependence of kobs on PE concentration was well defined, in contrast to what was observed for NE. Unlike NE's effect on this mutant, there was saturation with PE demonstrating a KM of 290 ± 51 nM and a kcat of 8.7 ± 0.39 x 10–3 s–1. Therefore, unlike for NE activation of INa these mutations had a minimal effect on PE activation of INa. The parameters for the
IPRNorm versus concentration were K1/2 of 77 ± 30 nM and 35 ± 9.2 nM for both wild type and
ß
V182G;V19G, respectively, and (
IPRNorm)Max were 0.7 ± 0.2 and 1 ± 0.05, respectively. Clearly for both wild type and
ß
V182G;V193G, activation saturation occurred at low enzyme concentrations (Fig. 8 B) and no difference could be discerned between the two constructs. In contrast to these minor effects, the concentration dependence of PE activation of INa in the
ß
A190G mutant was significantly impaired. The kobs increased slowly with enzyme concentration, showing no apparent saturation (Fig. 9 A).
Linear regression gave kcat/KM of
550 M–1s–1. Thus PE activation of wild-type ENaC was
100-fold more efficient than PE activation of
ß
A190G. This loss in efficiency is accompanied by a 15-fold increase of the K1/2 for
IPRNorm to 1,140 nM (Fig. 9 B).
NE and PE Cleavage of the
ENaC Segment
Next NE and PE were evaluated for their ability to cleave the identified region of
ENaC and the specific proteolytic sites were determined by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The peptide T176-S198 (200 µM), corresponding to the amino acid sequence T176 to S198 of the
ENaC subunit, was incubated with 200 nM NE or PE in tris-acetate buffer. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry showed the undigested peptide T176-S198 at m/z of 2546.6 D. Incubation of peptide T176-S198 with NE for 5 min resulted in a new peak at 1950.9 D corresponding to the molecular weight of peptide T176-V193 as well as a new peak at 615.3 D corresponding to the peptide M194-S198 along with undigested full-length peptide at 2547.1 D (Table III).
Mass spectrometry of the PE digest showed the appearance of new peaks at 1650.8 D and 915.2 corresponding to peptides T176-A190 and S191-S198, respectively (Table III). These fragments indicated that NE hydrolyzed the peptide between V193 and M194 primarily, whereas PE hydrolyzed the peptide between A190 and S191. Cleavages at the specific sites were detected within 1 min of incubation. After prolonged incubation with NE (30 min), a peak at 886.0 D corresponding to the peptide T176-V182 was also evident but minor, suggesting that cleavage by NE can occur between V182 and G183 but is not efficient. Substitution of V182 and V193 with glycines prevented cleavage of the peptide by NE and glycine substitution of A190 prevented cleavage by PE. Consequently, a peptide with a sequence contained within
ENaC can be cleaved by NE and PE at the cleavage sites corresponding to the residues that mediate channel activation by the enzymes.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE III Peptide Products Derived from a Segment of Human ENaC after Protease Digestion and Analysis by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
| |