The Journal of General Physiology
World Precision Insruments
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1816K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hui, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hui, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 99, 985-1016, Copyright © 1992 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Separation of Q beta and Q gamma charge components in frog cut twitch fibers with tetracaine. Critical comparison with other methods

CS Hui and W Chen
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis 46202.

Charge movement was measured in frog cut twitch fibers with the double Vaseline-gap technique. 25 microM tetracaine had very little effect on the maximum amounts of Q beta and Q gamma but slowed the kinetics of the I gamma humps in the ON segments of TEST-minus-CONTROL current traces, giving rise to biphasic transients in the difference traces. This concentration of tetracaine also shifted V gamma 3.7 (SEM 0.7) mV in the depolarizing direction, resulting in a difference Q-V plot that was bell-shaped with a peak at approximately -50 mV. 0.5-1.0 mM tetracaine suppressed the total amount of charge. The suppressed component had a sigmoidal voltage distribution with V = -56.6 (SEM 1.1) mV, k = 2.5 (SEM 0.5) mV, and qmax/cm = 9.2 (SEM 1.5) nC/microF, suggesting that the tetracaine-sensitive charge had a steep voltage dependence, a characteristic of the Q gamma component. An intermediate concentration (0.1-0.5 mM) of tetracaine shifted V gamma and partially suppressed the tetracaine-sensitive charge, resulting in a difference Q- V plot that rose to a peak and then decayed to a plateau level. Following a TEST pulse to greater than -60 mV, the slow inward current component during a post-pulse to approximately -60 mV was also tetracaine sensitive. The voltage distribution of the charge separated by tetracaine (method 1) was compared with those separated by three other existing methods: (a) the charge associated with the hump component separated by a sum of two kinetic functions from the ON segment of a TEST-minus-CONTROL current trace (method 2), (b) the steeply voltage-dependent component separated from a Q-V plot of the total charge by fitting with a sum of two Boltzmann distribution functions (method 3), and (c) the sigmoidal component separated from the Q-V plot of the final OFF charge obtained with a two-pulse protocol (method 4). The steeply voltage-dependent components separated by all four methods are consistent with each other, and are therefore concluded to be equivalent to the same Q gamma component. The shortcomings of each separation method are critically discussed. Since each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, it is recommended that, as much as possible, Q gamma should be separated by more than one method to obtain more reliable results.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
C. S. Hui
Association of the I{gamma} and I{delta} Charge Movement with Calcium Release in Frog Skeletal Muscle
Biophys. J., February 1, 2005; 88(2): 1030 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Squecco, C. Bencini, C. Piperio, and F. Francini
L-type Ca2+ channel and ryanodine receptor cross-talk in frog skeletal muscle
J. Physiol., February 15, 2004; 555(1): 137 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
G. Brum, N. Piriz, R. DeArmas, E. Rios, M. Stern, and G. Pizarro
Differential Effects of Voltage-Dependent Inactivation and Local Anesthetics on Kinetic Phases of Ca2+ Release in Frog Skeletal Muscle
Biophys. J., July 1, 2003; 85(1): 245 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Chawla, J. N. Skepper, and C. L.-H. Huang
Differential effects of sarcoplasmic reticular Ca2+-ATPase inhibition on charge movements and calcium transients in intact amphibian skeletal muscle fibres
J. Physiol., March 15, 2002; 539(3): 869 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents