The Journal of General Physiology
Axon Instruments microelectrode amplifiers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1216K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mesibov, R.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mesibov, R.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 62, 203-223, Copyright © 1973 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range

Weber law and related phenomena



Robert Mesibov 1, George W. Ordal 1, and Julius Adler 1

1 From the Departments of Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Attractant was added to a suspension of bacteria (the background concentration of attractant) and then these bacteria were exposed to a yet higher concentration of attractant in a capillary. Chemotaxis was measured by determining how many bacteria accumulated in the capillary. The response range for chemotaxis lies between the threshold concentration and the saturating concentration. The breadth of this range is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. Attractants detected by the same chemoreceptor can have their response ranges in widely different places. Over the center of the response range (on a logarithmic scale), bacteria give similar sized responses to similar fractional increases of concentration, i.e. they respond to ratios of attractant concentration, but the response peaks at the center of the range. The size of the response is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. For a detectable response, a smaller increase in attractant concentration is needed for attractants detected by some chemoreceptors than for attractants detected by others. Although the data are inadequate, it appears that the Weber law may be observed over a wide range of concentrations for some attractants but not for others. In the Appendix we aim to explain some of these results in terms of the interaction of an attractant with its chemoreceptor according to the law of mass action.

Submitted on November 28, 1972


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Ahmed and R. Stocker
Experimental Verification of the Behavioral Foundation of Bacterial Transport Parameters Using Microfluidics
Biophys. J., November 1, 2008; 95(9): 4481 - 4493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Tu, T. S. Shimizu, and H. C. Berg
Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli
PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 14855 - 14860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. W. Kasinskas and N. S. Forbes
Salmonella typhimurium Lacking Ribose Chemoreceptors Localize in Tumor Quiescence and Induce Apoptosis
Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3201 - 3209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
R. G. Bakker, C. Li, M. R. Miller, C. Cunningham, and N. W. Charon
Identification of Specific Chemoattractants and Genetic Complementation of a Borrelia burgdorferi Chemotaxis Mutant: Flow Cytometry-Based Capillary Tube Chemotaxis Assay
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 15, 2007; 73(4): 1180 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
R. Lux and W. Shi
CHEMOTAXIS-GUIDED MOVEMENTS IN BACTERIA
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., July 1, 2004; 15(4): 207 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
H. Szurmant and G. W. Ordal
Diversity in Chemotaxis Mechanisms among the Bacteria and Archaea
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2004; 68(2): 301 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
A. M. J. Law and M. D. Aitken
Bacterial Chemotaxis to Naphthalene Desorbing from a Nonaqueous Liquid
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2003; 69(10): 5968 - 5973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
S. E. Greer-Phillips, G. Alexandre, B. L. Taylor, and I. B. Zhulin
Aer and Tsr guide Escherichia coli in spatial gradients of oxidizable substrates
Microbiology, September 1, 2003; 149(9): 2661 - 2667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Mao, P. S. Cremer, and M. D. Manson
A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis
PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5449 - 5454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. N. Barnakov, L. A. Barnakova, and G. L. Hazelbauer
Allosteric Enhancement of Adaptational Demethylation by a Carboxyl-terminal Sequence on Chemoreceptors
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 42151 - 42156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. C. Lamanna, J. E. Gestwicki, L. E. Strong, S. L. Borchardt, R. M. Owen, and L. L. Kiessling
Conserved Amplification of Chemotactic Responses through Chemoreceptor Interactions
J. Bacteriol., September 15, 2002; 184(18): 4981 - 4987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. M. Stock
A nonlinear stimulus-response relation in bacterial chemotaxis
PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 10945 - 10947.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Jasuja, Yu-Lin, D. R. Trentham, and S. Khan
Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis
PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 11346 - 11351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. A. J. Duke and D. Bray
Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors
PNAS, August 31, 1999; 96(18): 10104 - 10108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
R. B. Marx and M. D. Aitken
Quantification of Chemotaxis to Naphthalene by Pseudomonas putida G7
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 1999; 65(7): 2847 - 2852.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Oh, Y. Park, and C. Park
A Mutated PtsG, the Glucose Transporter, Allows Uptake of D-Ribose
J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 1999; 274(20): 14006 - 14011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Muskavitch, E. Kort, M. Springer, M. Goy, and J Adler
Attraction by repellents: an error in sensory information processing by bacterial mutants
Science, July 7, 1978; 201(4350): 63 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. Koshland Jr
A response regulator model in a simple sensory system
Science, June 3, 1977; 196(4294): 1055 - 1063.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. Sourjik and H. C. Berg
Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis
PNAS, January 8, 2002; 99(1): 123 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents