|
||
ARTICLE |
Weber law and related phenomena
Attractant was added to a suspension of bacteria (the background concentration of attractant) and then these bacteria were exposed to a yet higher concentration of attractant in a capillary. Chemotaxis was measured by determining how many bacteria accumulated in the capillary. The response range for chemotaxis lies between the threshold concentration and the saturating concentration. The breadth of this range is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. Attractants detected by the same chemoreceptor can have their response ranges in widely different places. Over the center of the response range (on a logarithmic scale), bacteria give similar sized responses to similar fractional increases of concentration, i.e. they respond to ratios of attractant concentration, but the response peaks at the center of the range. The size of the response is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. For a detectable response, a smaller increase in attractant concentration is needed for attractants detected by some chemoreceptors than for attractants detected by others. Although the data are inadequate, it appears that the Weber law may be observed over a wide range of concentrations for some attractants but not for others. In the Appendix we aim to explain some of these results in terms of the interaction of an attractant with its chemoreceptor according to the law of mass action.
Submitted on November 28, 1972
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ahmed and R. Stocker Experimental Verification of the Behavioral Foundation of Bacterial Transport Parameters Using Microfluidics Biophys. J., November 1, 2008; 95(9): 4481 - 4493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tu, T. S. Shimizu, and H. C. Berg Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 14855 - 14860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Kasinskas and N. S. Forbes Salmonella typhimurium Lacking Ribose Chemoreceptors Localize in Tumor Quiescence and Induce Apoptosis Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3201 - 3209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Bakker, C. Li, M. R. Miller, C. Cunningham, and N. W. Charon Identification of Specific Chemoattractants and Genetic Complementation of a Borrelia burgdorferi Chemotaxis Mutant: Flow Cytometry-Based Capillary Tube Chemotaxis Assay Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 15, 2007; 73(4): 1180 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lux and W. Shi CHEMOTAXIS-GUIDED MOVEMENTS IN BACTERIA Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., July 1, 2004; 15(4): 207 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Szurmant and G. W. Ordal Diversity in Chemotaxis Mechanisms among the Bacteria and Archaea Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2004; 68(2): 301 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. J. Law and M. D. Aitken Bacterial Chemotaxis to Naphthalene Desorbing from a Nonaqueous Liquid Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2003; 69(10): 5968 - 5973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Greer-Phillips, G. Alexandre, B. L. Taylor, and I. B. Zhulin Aer and Tsr guide Escherichia coli in spatial gradients of oxidizable substrates Microbiology, September 1, 2003; 149(9): 2661 - 2667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mao, P. S. Cremer, and M. D. Manson A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5449 - 5454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Barnakov, L. A. Barnakova, and G. L. Hazelbauer Allosteric Enhancement of Adaptational Demethylation by a Carboxyl-terminal Sequence on Chemoreceptors J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 42151 - 42156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Lamanna, J. E. Gestwicki, L. E. Strong, S. L. Borchardt, R. M. Owen, and L. L. Kiessling Conserved Amplification of Chemotactic Responses through Chemoreceptor Interactions J. Bacteriol., September 15, 2002; 184(18): 4981 - 4987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Stock A nonlinear stimulus-response relation in bacterial chemotaxis PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 10945 - 10947. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jasuja, Yu-Lin, D. R. Trentham, and S. Khan Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 11346 - 11351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. J. Duke and D. Bray Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors PNAS, August 31, 1999; 96(18): 10104 - 10108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Marx and M. D. Aitken Quantification of Chemotaxis to Naphthalene by Pseudomonas putida G7 Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 1999; 65(7): 2847 - 2852. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Oh, Y. Park, and C. Park A Mutated PtsG, the Glucose Transporter, Allows Uptake of D-Ribose J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 1999; 274(20): 14006 - 14011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Muskavitch, E. Kort, M. Springer, M. Goy, and J Adler Attraction by repellents: an error in sensory information processing by bacterial mutants Science, July 7, 1978; 201(4350): 63 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Koshland Jr A response regulator model in a simple sensory system Science, June 3, 1977; 196(4294): 1055 - 1063. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sourjik and H. C. Berg Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis PNAS, January 8, 2002; 99(1): 123 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|