The Journal of General Physiology
Axon Instruments microelectrode amplifiers
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pincus, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pincus, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of General Physiology, Vol 15, 243-256, Copyright © 1931 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

ANALYSIS OF THE GEOTROPIC ORIENTATION OF YOUNG RATS. IV

W. J. Crozier 1 and G. Pincus 1

1 From the Laboratory of General Physiology, Harvard University, Cambridge

The geotropic orientation of young rats of a closely inbred line P, separated 6 years ago from a stock which gave rise also to the closely inbred lines A and B previously studied, has been measured. The curve connecting orientation-angle with inclination of substratum is in a general way similar to those for A, B, and with them differs markedly from that for race K of totally different ancestry. The variability of the response exhibits similar affinities. Although the orientation-angles are rather close to those obtained with A, the threshold slope for P is that for B; analysis of the curve discloses how this fact is related to the character of the presumptive distributions of thresholds for the respective arrays of tension-receptor units. It is pointed out that these considerations prevent loose comparisons of "geotropic sensitivity" in different lines of rats, but make it plain why comparisons in terms of thresholds for response or of magnitude of response at the same threshold are ineffective. The estimated "number of excitation units," however, is found to correspond to the variability of orientation, and to the manner and extent whereby the dispersions of the measured orientation-angles are governed by the magnitude of the gravitational vector.

Accepted on September 3, 1931


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents