Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF, 788K) PPT slides of all figures Supplemental Material Index Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JGP Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Babich, O. Articles by Shirokov, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Babich, O. Articles by Shirokov, R. Related Collections Related Article Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

¹ Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103
² Department of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102

Correspondence to Roman Shirokov: roman.shirokov{at}umdnj.edu

Lanthanide gadolinium (Gd³⁺) blocks Ca_V1.2 channels at the selectivity filter. Here we investigated whether Gd³⁺ block interferes with Ca²⁺-dependent inactivation, which requires Ca²⁺ entry through the same site. Using brief pulses to 200 mV that relieve Gd³⁺ block but not inactivation, we monitored how the proportions of open and open-blocked channels change during inactivation. We found that blocked channels inactivate much less. This is expected for Gd³⁺ block of the Ca²⁺ influx that enhances inactivation. However, we also found that the extent of Gd³⁺ block did not change when inactivation was reduced by abolition of Ca²⁺/calmodulin interaction, showing that Gd³⁺ does not block the inactivated channel. Thus, Gd³⁺ block and inactivation are mutually exclusive, suggesting action at a common site. These observations suggest that inactivation causes a change at the selectivity filter that either hides the Gd³⁺ site or reduces its affinity, or that Ca²⁺ occupies the binding site at the selectivity filter in inactivated channels. The latter possibility is supported by previous findings that the EEQE mutation of the selectivity EEEE locus is void of Ca²⁺-dependent inactivation (Zong Z.Q., J.Y. Zhou, and T. Tanabe. 1994. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201:1117–11123), and that Ca²⁺-inactivated channels conduct Na⁺ when Ca²⁺ is removed from the extracellular medium (Babich O., D. Isaev, and R. Shirokov. 2005. J. Physiol. 565:709–717). Based on these results, we propose that inactivation increases affinity of the selectivity filter for Ca²⁺ so that Ca²⁺ ion blocks the pore. A minimal model, in which the inactivation "gate" is an increase in affinity of the selectivity filter for permeating ions, successfully simulates the characteristic U-shaped voltage dependence of inactivation in Ca²⁺.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

And Yet It Moves: Conformational States of the Ca²⁺ Channel Pore

Riccardo Olcese
J. Gen. Physiol. 2007 129: 457-459. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Peinelt, A. Lis, A. Beck, A. Fleig, and R. Penner 2-Aminoethoxydiphenyl borate directly facilitates and indirectly inhibits STIM1-dependent gating of CRAC channels J. Physiol., July 1, 2008; 586(13): 3061 - 3073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Yamashita, L. Navarro-Borelly, B. A. McNally, and M. Prakriya Orai1 Mutations Alter Ion Permeation and Ca2+-dependent Fast Inactivation of CRAC Channels: Evidence for Coupling of Permeation and Gating J. Gen. Physiol., October 29, 2007; 130(5): 525 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Babich, J. Reeves, and R. Shirokov Block of CaV1.2 Channels by Gd3+ Reveals Preopening Transitions in the Selectivity Filter J. Gen. Physiol., June 1, 2007; 129(6): 461 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Olcese And Yet It Moves: Conformational States of the Ca2+ Channel Pore J. Gen. Physiol., June 1, 2007; 129(6): 457 - 459. [Full Text] [PDF]

Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents