The Journal of General Physiology
Cell MicroControls
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 25 November 2002. doi:10.1085/jgp.20028702
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow PDF (Full Text)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JGP
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, W.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yau, K.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, W.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yau, K.-W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
© Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1295/2002/12/817/ $5.00
Journal of General Physiology, Volume 120, Number 6, December 2002 817-827

Rod Sensitivity During Xenopus Development

Wei-Hong Xiong1 and King-Wai Yau1,2,3

1 Departments of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
2 Departments of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
3 Departments of Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205

Address correspondence to Dr. King-Wai Yau, Room 907, Preclinical Teaching Building, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. Fax: (410) 614-3579; E-mail: KYAU1{at}jhem.jhmi.edu

We have measured the sensitivity of rod photoreceptors from overnight-dark–adapted Xenopus laevis through developmental stages 46–66 into adulthood by using suction-pipette recording. The dark current increased gradually from ~5 pA at stage 46 to ~20 pA at stage 57, compared with an adult (metamorphosed) current of ~35 pA. This increase in dark current largely paralleled the progressive increase in length and diameter of the rod outer segment (ROS). Throughout stages 46–66, the dark current increased approximately linearly with ROS surface area. At stage 53, there was a steep (~10-fold) increase in the rod flash sensitivity, accompanied by a steep increase in the time-to-peak of the half-saturated flash response. This covariance of sensitivity and time-to-peak suggested a change in the state of adaptation of rods at stage 53 and thereafter. When the isolated retina was preincubated with 11-cis-retinal, the flash sensitivity and the response time-to-peak of rods before stage 53 became similar to those at or after stage 53, suggesting that the presence of free opsin (i.e., visual pigment without chromophore) in rods before stage 53 was responsible for the adapted state (low sensitivity and short time-to-peak). By comparing the response sensitivity before stage 53 to the sensitivity at/after stage 53 measured from rods that had been subjected to various known bleaches, we estimated that 22–28% of rod opsin in stage 50–52 tadpoles (i.e., before stage 53) was devoid of chromophore despite overnight dark-adaptation. When continuously dark adapted for 7 d or longer, however, even tadpoles before stage 53 yielded rods with similar flash sensitivity and response time-to-peak as those of later-stage animals. In conclusion, it appears that chromophore regeneration is very slow in tadpoles before stage 53, but this regeneration becomes much more efficient at stage 53. A similar delay in the maturity of chromophore regeneration may partially underlie the low sensitivity of rods observed in newborn mammals, including human infants.

Key Words: retinaldehyde • rat • vision


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JGPHome page
Q. He, D. Alexeev, M. E. Estevez, S. L. McCabe, P. D. Calvert, D. E. Ong, M. C. Cornwall, A. L. Zimmerman, and C. L. Makino
Cyclic Nucleotide-gated Ion Channels in Rod Photoreceptors Are Protected from Retinoid Inhibition
J. Gen. Physiol., October 1, 2006; 128(4): 473 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
D.-G. Luo and K.-W. Yau
Rod Sensitivity of Neonatal Mouse and Rat
J. Gen. Physiol., August 29, 2005; 126(3): 263 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
E. Solessio, S. S. Mani, N. Cuenca, G. A. Engbretson, R. B. Barlow, and B. E. Knox
Developmental regulation of calcium-dependent feedback in Xenopus rods
J. Gen. Physiol., October 25, 2004; 124(5): 569 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents